Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
Found the internet!
2.6k
Posted by3 months ago

Spacex Booster 7 ignition test?

Play
0:00
0:00
Settings
Fullscreen
414 comments
98% Upvoted
level 1
ModModerator Achievement · 3 mo. ago · Stickied comment

Thank you for participating in r/SpaceX! Please take a moment to familiarise yourself with our community rules before commenting. Here's a reminder of some of our most important rules:

  • Keep it civil, and directly relevant to SpaceX and the thread. Comments consisting solely of jokes, memes, pop culture references, etc. will be removed.

  • Don't downvote content you disagree with, unless it clearly doesn't contribute to constructive discussion.

  • Check out these threads for discussion of common topics.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Vote
level 1
· 3 mo. ago · edited 3 mo. ago

The explosion is so quick that it seems like something might have already leaked out before the blast. Like fuel was already in the air before ignition

More angles and sound: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=05Yiw7_JTXY

411
level 2

I wonder how hard/possible it would be to make an open-air gas chromatography–mass spectrometer to detect this. I'm imagining a handful of lasers crisscrossing the volume beneath/around the booster.

Maybe it would be simpler to do what people mentioned about other boosters, and just make sure there's something that causes leaks to get burnt off before they can accumulate.

94
level 2

There's something in the air tonight.

27
level 2

They did a full spin up test of the turbopumps before, where more fuel is exhausted unburned. They want to do this tests in the future without all 33 engines at the same time.

4
level 2

Damnit Tory!

5
level 2

It doesn't sound like an engine start sequence, but the bang makes me think whatever was coming out was in a good air fuel mix for an explosion to occur.

1
level 2

Looks like the flame originated from the engine section and move towards the ground. I think it's mostly from the giant gas release right before the flame.

1
level 2

Also afterwards. How black the fire ploom and smoke was doesnt look healthy

1
level 2

They call that sort of thing a "hot start" in the aviation world

1

2 more replies

level 1

That did not look nominal.

627
level 2

Yeah, actually not good. Team is assessing damage.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1546639772621365248

285
level 2

Nor did it appear norminal

103
level 2

Looks like the fuel failed to ignite until too late

21
level 2

I think this is what they call a "hard start."

Methane is a good deal lighter than air, and it is easily ignited. Delta IV launches usually are wreathed in burning hydrogen. ULA does something to make sure the leaking hydrogen during the start sequence is burnt in a relatively safe manner, and that it does not get into confined spaces and explode. This looks like a similar problem, that might require a similar solution.

31
level 2

I know it wasn't normal, but it looked as expected to me. Aerosol a fuel in the air, provide a spark, and boom. All engines do this. This was just 33x bigger boom. https://youtu.be/P3-tgfJiNfQ

6

About Community

Welcome to r/SpaceX, the premier SpaceX discussion community and the largest fan-run board on the American aerospace company SpaceX. We recommend using r/SpaceX with Old Reddit. This board is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
Created Aug 22, 2011

1.7m

DragonRiders

379

in orbit